Explaining the Du’a of Qunut in the Witr Prayer – Shaykh ibn Uthaymeen

Explaining the Du’á of Qunūt in the Witr Prayer
شرح دعاء قنوت الوتر :Original Title
Author: Muḥammad Ibn Ṣāliḥ al-‘Uthaymīn
Translator : Abu az-Zubayr Harrison –  authentic-translations.com

Contents

Introduction
The Du’ā
The Explanation of: “Oh Allah, guide me with those you have guided.”
The Explanation of: “Heal me with those you have healed.”
The Explanation of: “Care for me with those you have cared for.”
The Explanation of: “Bless me in what you have given…”
The Explanation of: “…and protect me from the evil of what you have decreed.”
The Explanation of: “Indeed, you decree while no one decrees against you.”
The Explanation of: “Whomever you show loyalty towards will never be humiliated…”
The Explanation of: “…and whomever you show enmity towards will never be honored.”
The Explanation of: “Blessed are you, our lord, and you are exalted far above.”
Questions & Answers Regarding the Du’ā of Qunūt
The Du’ā of Qunūt (for memorization)

Click below link to read or download article PDF

Explaining the Dua of Qunut in the Witr Prayer-Shaykh Uthaymeen- Authentic-Translations.com

Explaining the Du’ā of Qunūt in the Witr Prayer
Original Title: شرح دعاء قنوت الوتر
Author: Muḥammad Ibn Ṣāliḥ al-‘Uthaymīn

Explaining the Du’ā of Qunūt in the Witr Prayer

Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2
The Du’ā…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3
The Explanation of: “Oh Allah, guide me with those you have guided.”……………………………….4
The Explanation of: “Heal me with those you have healed.”………………………………………………8
The Explanation of: “Care for me with those you have cared for.”…………………………………….10
The Explanation of: “Bless me in what you have given…”……………………………………………….12
The Explanation of: “…and protect me from the evil of what you have decreed.”………………..15
The Explanation of: “Indeed, you decree while no one decrees against you.”…………………….18
The Explanation of: “Whomever you show loyalty towards will never be humiliated…”………..19
The Explanation of: “…and whomever you show enmity towards will never be honored.”…….21
The Explanation of: “Blessed are you, our lord, and you are exalted far above.”…………………23
Questions & Answers Regarding the Du’ā of Qunūt…………………………………………………………25
The Du’ā of Qunūt (for memorization)……………………………………………………………………………33


Introduction¹

All praise and thanks are due to Allah. We praise him, seek his help and his forgiveness. We seek protection with him from the evils of our own souls and from our bad deeds. Whoever Allah guides, no one can misguide him, and whoever he sends astray, there is no other guide for him. I testify that nothing has any right to be worshipped except Allah alone, having no partner, and I testify that Muhammad is his servant and messenger ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ).

This is a concise explanation of the du’ā, or supplication that is said during the Witr prayer.² This explanation was given by Muhammad Ibn Ṣāliḥ al-‘Uthaymīn, may Allah have mercy on him, during his lectures he used to give in the central mosque in Mecca during the blessed month of Ramadan.


¹ The original Arabic text of this book is available online at: http://www.ibnothaimeen.com/all/books/cat_index_336.shtml

² The Witr, or “Odd” prayer is the last prayer one may pray at night, before the morning prayer, consisting of an odd number of units of prayer. The prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) used to say the Du’ā of Qunūt sometimes while standing during the Witr prayer. He would raise his hands while supplicating and would sometimes do it before bowing or after bowing.


The Du’ā

Abū Dāwūd recorded a ḥadīth from al-Ḥasan Ibn ‘Alī ( رضي الله عنه ) that he said: Allah’s messenger ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) taught me some words to say³ during the Qunūt of the Witr prayer:

اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي فِيمَنْ هَدَيْت،َ وَعَافِنِي فِيمَنْ عَافَيْت،َ وَتَوَلَّنِي فِيمَنْ تَوَلَّيْت،َ وَبَارِكْ لِي
فِيمَا أَعْطَيْت،َ وَقِنِي شَرَّ مَا قَضَيْت،َ إِنَّكَ تَقْضِي وَلَا يُقْضَى عَلَيْك،َ وَإِنَّهُ لَا يَذِلُّ مَنْ
وَالَيْت،َ وَلَا يَعِزُّ مَنْ عَادَيْت،َ تَبَارَكْتَ رَبَّنَا وَتَعَالَيْتَ

Oh Allah, guide me with those you have guided. Heal me with those you have healed. Care for me with those you have cared for. Bless me in what you have given, and protect me from the evil of what you have decreed. Indeed, you decree while no one decrees against you. Whomever you show loyalty towards will never be humiliated, and whomever you show enmity towards will never be honored. Blessed are you, our lord, and you are exalted far above (any weakness).⁴


³ In order to facilitate the memorization of this Du’ā, the final two pages of this document contain the Arabic text as well as the transliteration and English meanings in a simple, line-by-line format.
⁴ This ḥadīth is recorded by Abū Dāwūd (no. 1425, 1426) and al-Albānī said it is authentic in “Saḥīḥ Sunan Abī Dāwood” (no. 1263). It is also recorded by al-Tirmidhī, “Saḥīḥ Sunan al-Tirmidhī” (no. 411), and by al-Nasāī, “Saḥīḥ Sunan al-Nasāī” (no. 1647). The ḥadīth is also recorded by Ahmad (1/199) and al-Dārimī. Ahmad Shākir also said it is authentic in his notes of “Sunan al-Tirmidhī”.


The Explanation of:
اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي فِيمَنْ هَدَيْتَ
“Oh Allah, guide me with those you have guided.”

Meaning: Guide me to the truth and assist me in acting in accordance with it. Complete, beneficial guidance is that in which Allah combines for a servant both knowledge and action. Guidance without action is of no real benefit. Rather it is even harmful because if a person does not act in accordance with what he already knows, his knowledge becomes evidence against him.

An example of guidance in the form of knowledge but with no action is the verse of Allah:

﴿ وَأَمَّا ثَمُودُ فَهَدَيْنَاهُمْ فَاسْتَحَبُّوا الْعَمَى عَلَى الْهُدَى ﴾
As for Thamūd, we guided them but they preferred blindness over guidance.

Meaning: We clarified the path to them and we conveyed the knowledge to them. However, they preferred blindness over guidance, and from this we seek refuge with Allah.

Also from this type of guidance – simply giving the knowledge and clarifying the truth – is the statement of Allah ( سبحانه وتعالى ) to the Prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ):

﴿ وَإِنَّكَ لَتَهْدِي إِلَى صِرَاطٍ مُسْتَقِيمٍ ﴾
And certainly, you guide to the straight path.

Meaning: You direct the people to the straight path and teach them about it. As for the other type of guidance which is the granting of success, an example of this type is the verse:

﴿ إِنَّكَ لَا تَهْدِي مَنْ أَحْبَبْتَ ﴾
Indeed, you can’t guide whoever you like.

This type is the guidance of granting one success in their deeds. In this case, the messenger ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) is never able to grant someone the success of their good actions as this type of guidance is specific to Allah alone. If the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) were capable of that type of guidance, he would have guided his uncle, Abū Ṭālib. He did try to guide his uncle and even when he was about to die, the Prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) said to him:

يَا عَمِّ قُلْ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّهُ كَلِمَةً أَشْهَدُ لَكَ بِهَا عِنْدَ اللَّهِ
Oh uncle, say, “There is nothing worthy of worship except Allah,” – a statement by which I will testify on your behalf before Allah.

But the decree of Allah ( عزّ وجلّ ) had already passed that the prophet’s uncle would be from the inhabitants of the Fire, and from this we seek refuge with Allah. So Abū Ṭālib neither said nor believed that nothing has the right to be worshipped except Allah. The last thing he said before dying was that he would remain upon the religion of ‘Abdul-Muṭṭalib.⁸ Despite this, Allah allowed his messenger ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) to intercede for Abū Ṭālib, not just because he was the prophet’s uncle, but because he used to continually defend the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) and Islam (even though he did not personally accept Islam). So the Prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) interceded for Abū Ṭālib and as a result of this intercession, he ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) said about his uncle:

هُوَ فِي ضَحْضَاحٍ مِنْ نَارٍ وَلَوْلَا أَنَا لَكَانَ فِي الدَّرَكِ الْأَسْفَلِ مِنْ النَّارِ
He is in the lowest part of the fire, and if it were not for me, he would have been in the lowest, deepest part of the fire.⁹

And the Prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) also said:

لَعَلَّهُ تَنْفَعُهُ شَفَاعَتِي يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ فَيُجْعَلُ فِي ضَحْضَاحٍ مِنْ النَّارِ يَبْلُغُ كَعْبَيْهِ يَغْلِي مِنْهُ دِمَاغُهُ
Perhaps my intercession will benefit him on the Day of Resurrection so that he will be put into the lowest part of the fire, it reaching only to his ankles, yet from which his brain will boil.¹⁰

So when we say in the Du’ā of Qunūt, “Guide us with those you have guided,” we are asking Allah for both types of guidance: the guidance of knowledge and the guidance of being successful in our actions. As an example, the following verse also includes both of these types of guidance:

﴿ اهْدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ الْمُسْتَقِيمَ ﴾
Guide us to the straight path.¹¹

So when anyone says this du’ā he should sincerely call to mind that he is asking for both types of guidance: the guidance of the correct knowledge and the guidance of acting in accordance with it.

As for the wording, “…with those you have guided,” this is a way of seeking nearness to Allah by mentioning his favors on others in that he guided them. So we also ask him to bestow the same favor upon us and guide us. In other words, we ask you (Allah) for guidance, and receiving it is only by virtue of your mercy, your wisdom, and your past favors as you have guided others.


⁵ The Quran, Sūrah Fuṣṣilat, 41:17.
⁶ The Quran, Sūrah al-Shūrá, 42:52.
⁷ The Quran, Sūrah al-Qaṣaṣ, 28:56.
⁸ The ḥadīth is recorded by al-Bukhārī (no. 1360, 3884, and 4675) Muslim (no. 24), al-Nasāī (no. 2035), and by Aḥmad.
⁹ The ḥadīth is recorded by al-Bukhārī (no. 3883, 6208) and Muslim (no. 209) as well as by Imām Aḥmad.
¹⁰ The ḥadīth is recorded by al-Bukhārī (no. 3885, 6564) and Muslim (no. 210) and also by Aḥmad.
¹¹ The Quran, Sūrah al-Fātiḥah, 1:5.


The Explanation of:
وَعَافِنِي فِيمَنْ عَافَيْتَ
“Heal me with those you have healed.”

Meaning: Heal us from the sicknesses of the heart as well as the physical sicknesses of the body. So my brother, you must sincerely bring to mind that while you are calling upon Allah, he will heal you of both the diseases of the body and those of the heart. And it must be understood that the diseases of the heart are much worse than physical diseases. For this reason, some people say while supplicating, “Oh Allah, do not make our problems and tribulations in our religion.”

The bodily diseases and sicknesses are well-known, yet the diseases of the heart come from two main sources:

  1. Diseases of vain desires, and they originate from one’s personal likes and dislikes.
  2. Diseases of doubts and uncertainties, and they originate from ignorance.

As for the first, the diseases of one’s personal desires, a person may know the truth, yet may not want to follow it due to some personal preferences that are contrary to the teachings the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) came with.

And as for the second diseases, that of doubts and false assumptions due to one’s ignorance, it is when an ignorant person does incorrect actions while assuming they are correct. This disease is extremely dangerous. So you ask Allah for healing and immunity from both the diseases of the body and of the heart, which are the sicknesses of doubts and false assumptions, and vain desires.


The Explanation of:
وَتَوَلَّنِي فِيمَنْ تَوَلَّيْتَ
“Care for me with those you have cared for.”

Meaning: Be a close, watchful companion and ally to us. This type of companionship or guardianship is of two types, a general type of guardianship and a specific type. The specific type is particular to the believers only as Allah ( سبحانه وتعالى ) says:

﴿ اللَّهُ وَلِيُّ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا يُخْرِجُهُمْ مِنَ الظُّلُمَاتِ إِلَى النُّورِ وَالَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَوْلِيَاؤُهُمُ الطَّاغُوتُ يُخْرِجُونَهُمْ مِنَ النُّورِ إِلَى الظُّلُمَاتِ أُولَئِكَ أَصْحَابُ النَّارِ هُمْ فِيهَا خَالِدُونَ ﴾
Allah is the ally, guardian of those who believe. He brings them out from darkness into light. And those who disbelieve, their allies, guardians are their false gods. They take them out of light into darkness. Those are the companions of the Fire; they will abide eternally therein.¹²

So you ask Allah for this special type of alliance, guardianship, and companionship which includes his protection. It also includes Allah granting success to the person in following what Allah loves and is pleased with.

As for the general type of guardianship, it includes everyone; Allah is carefully watching over every person as He says:

﴿ حَتَّى إِذَا جَاءَ أَحَدَكُمُ الْمَوْتُ تَوَفَّتْهُ رُسُلُنَا وَهُمْ لَا يُفَرِّطُونَ ﴾
…until when death comes to one of you, our messengers (angels) take him, and they never fail in their duties.¹³

This is general for everyone. Then Allah says in the next verse:

﴿ ثُمَّ رُدُّوا إِلَى اللَّهِ مَوْلَاهُمُ الْحَقِّ أَلَا لَهُ الْحُكْمُ وَهُوَ أَسْرَعُ الْحَاسِبِينَ ﴾
Then they are returned to Allah, their true lord. Unquestionably, the judgment is his, and he is the swiftest in taking to account.¹⁴

However, when we say, “Oh Allah, care for me with those you have cared for,” we want the specific type of alliance and companionship and it includes both protection and the success in following what Allah loves and is pleased with.


¹² The Quran, Sūrah al-Baqarah, 2:257.
¹³ The Quran, Sūrah al-An’ām, 6:61.
¹⁴ The Quran, Sūrah al-An’ām, 6:62.


The Explanation of:
وَبَارِكْ لِي فِيمَا أَعْطَيْتَ
“Bless me in what you have given…”

The Arabic word بَرَكَة (barakah) “blessing” literally means an abundance of anything good that is continuous. The scholars even trace this word and its meaning back to the word بِرْكَة (birkah) which means a large amount of water or any wide container or gathering of water that is constantly filled with water. Similarly, the word blessing means a continuously large amount of good. So the meaning of this statement is: Send blessings down upon everything you have given me.

The wording, “…in what you have given…” is comprehensive including anything Allah has given us of wealth, children, knowledge, and anything else Allah ( سبحانه وتعالى ) has bestowed upon us. So you ask Allah to put blessings in all of that. If Allah does not put blessings in what he has given you, you would surely be prevented from a great amount of good.

How many people have a wealth in abundance, yet it is as if they live in poverty? This is because they gain no real benefit from their wealth; they simply collect it and never benefit from it. This is the result of the blessings being removed from it.

Likewise, many people have lots of children and grandchildren, yet their children do not benefit their parents in anything due to their disobedience and ungratefulness. Such people have not been blessed in their children.

You also find some people to whom Allah has given a great amount of knowledge, yet it is as if he is illiterate. You see no traces of knowledge upon him in his worship, in his character, in his manners, nor in the way he treats others. Rather, his knowledge may even increase him in arrogance and considering himself to be above the rest of Allah’s worshippers, belittling and humiliating them. Such a person does not realize the one who bestowed this knowledge upon him is none other than Allah. You see that he never benefits people with his knowledge, neither with lessons, nor advice, nor with writings. On the contrary, he is exclusively centered only upon himself. This is without doubt a great loss, even though religious knowledge is one of the most blessed things Allah gives to a servant. One reason for this is that when you teach others and spread this knowledge among people, you are rewarded from several different perspectives:

  1. When you spread this religious knowledge, you are spreading the religion of Allah ( عزّ وجلّ ). So you work for the sake of Allah, opening people’s hearts with knowledge.
  2. From the blessings of spreading knowledge and teaching it is that by doing so, there is the preservation and protection of Allah’s legislation (religious laws). If it weren’t for the passing on of knowledge, the legislation would not have been preserved.
  3. Also from the blessings of spreading knowledge is that when you teach others, you do them a great deal of good. You give them insight into the religion of Allah. And when that person then worships Allah with knowledge and insight, you are rewarded with similar rewards he is given because it was you who directed him towards a particular good deed, and the one who directs another to do something good is just like the one who actually does it.¹⁵

Also, by spreading and teaching religious knowledge, one’s own knowledge increases. It is known that anyone who teaches a particular knowledge to people, his knowledge in that subject will increase. This is because in teaching, one is recalling what he previously learned and memorized as well as learning new things that he must prepare. To this meaning, there is a famous (Arabic) proverb regarding wealth, “It increases by spending it often, and it decreases if held in a tight fist.” Similarly, if knowledge is withheld and not taught, it will eventually decrease.


¹⁵ A proof of this is the ḥadīth recorded by Muslim (no. 1893), al-Tirmidhī (no. 2671), Abū Dāwūd (no. 5129), and by Aḥmad in which the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) said:
مَنْ دَلَّ عَلَى خَيْرٍ فَلَهُ مِثْلُ أَجْرِ فَاعِلِهِ
Whoever directs someone to do something good, he will have a reward like the one who actually did it.


The Explanation of:
وَقِنِي شَرَّ مَا قَضَيْتَ
“…and protect me from the evil of what you have decreed.”

Allah ( سبحانه وتعالى ) decrees for good things to happen and things that seem bad. As for his decreeing that which is good, it is that which is totally and absolutely good in itself, the decree of it and decision of it, and in whatever results from it.

An example of Allah’s decree in something good would be the decree and decision to provide mankind with sustenance, safety and security, tranquility, guidance, support, etc. These are all good in their decree and their results.

As for Allah’s decree in something bad, it is actually good in its decree (Allah makes decisions only based on the highest level of wisdom) even though it may result in something bad.

An example of this latter type would be a drought when a land is without of rain. This results in something bad (hardships upon the people), yet Allah’s decreeing it is good. And how is decreeing a drought something good? Is someone were to ask, “Allah decreed and decided to put us through a time of drought; the livestock die and the crops are ruined, so how is this good?”

To this we reply: Listen to this statement of Allah ( عزّ وجلّ ):

﴿ ظَهَرَ الْفَسَادُ فِي الْبَرِّ وَالْبَحْرِ بِمَا كَسَبَتْ أَيْدِي النَّاسِ لِيُذِيقَهُمْ بَعْضَ الَّذِي عَمِلُوا لَعَلَّهُمْ يَرْجِعُونَ ﴾
Corruption has appeared throughout the land and sea by (as a result of) what the hands of people have earned so that he may let them taste part of what they have done so that perhaps they may return (in repentance).¹⁶

In this case, the decree is for the utmost good and the most praiseworthy reason – the people returning to Allah, returning from sinning against him to his obedience. So the initial and immediate result may be bad, yet the initial decree and decision is actually good.

It should be noted that the words, “what you have decreed” here means whatever bad results may come from what you decreed. Indeed, Allah would only decree something that results in a bad outcome due to his complete, perfect and praiseworthy wisdom. The wording here does not mean, “Your bad decree” because the decree and decision of Allah is never bad or evil in itself. For this, the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) once said while praising his lord:

وَالْخَيْرُ كُلُّهُ فِي يَدَيْكَ وَالشَّرُّ لَيْسَ إِلَيْكَ
The good, all of it, is in your two hands, and evil is not attributed to you.¹⁷

So evil is never associated with or attributed to Allah.


¹⁶ The Quran, Sūrah al-Rūm, 30:41.
¹⁷ This is part of a long ḥadīth recorded by Muslim (no. 771), al-Tirmidhī (no. 3422), al-Nasāī (no. 897), Abū Dāwūd (no. 760), and by Aḥmad.


The Explanation of:
إِنَّكَ تَقْضِي وَلَا يُقْضَى عَلَيْكَ
“Indeed, you decree while no one decrees against you.”

Allah decrees and decides both the legislative decree (that which he likes and commands but that may or may not happen) and the universal decree (that which he may or may not like, yet he decrees that it must happen). Allah decrees and decides everything that happens due to His infinite, perfect wisdom.

As for the wording, “no one decrees against you,” this means that there is no one besides Allah that can decree anything over and beyond his will. So the servants will never judge or make any decision over Allah’s decision, yet Allah will certainly judge them. And He will question his servants, and no one will ever question him as he says:

﴿ لَا يُسْأَلُ عَمَّا يَفْعَلُ وَهُمْ يُسْأَلُونَ ﴾
He is not to be questioned about what He does, but they will be questioned.¹⁸


¹⁸ The Quran, Sūrah al-Anbiyā, 21:23.


The Explanation of:
وَإِنَّهُ لَا يَذِلُّ مَنْ وَالَيْتَ
“Whomever you show loyalty towards will never be humiliated.”

This sentence and the next one (“Whomever you show enmity towards will never be honored”) both provide more explanation and details of our previous request, “Care for me with those you have cared for.” If Allah watches over and guards a person as a companion would, then he would definitely never be humiliated. On the contrary, if He were to show enmity towards someone, such a person would never be honored. So this requires us to seek honor only from Allah alone and we fear and seek refuge from being dishonored and disgraced before Allah. It is not possible for one to be truly humiliated and disgraced when Allah has become his companion and guardian. The important thing is to try and achieve this type of companionship with Allah. Yet, how does one gain His companionship and loyalty?

This kind of allegiance, companionship, and loyalty is achieved by actualizing two significant characteristics, both of which have been clarified by Allah ( عزّ وجلّ ) in his book:

﴿ أَلَا إِنَّ أَوْلِيَاءَ اللَّهِ لَا خَوْفٌ عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا هُمْ يَحْزَنُونَ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَكَانُوا يَتَّقُونَ ﴾
Indeed, for the close allies of Allah there will be no fear upon them, nor will they grieve – those who believe and are constantly, fearfully conscious (of Allah).¹⁹

Of these two characteristics, one occurs in the heart and one upon the limbs. “Those who believe” is in the heart, and “…and are constantly, fearfully conscious (of Allah)” occurs upon the limbs. So when the heart and limbs are pure and correct, people gain this alliance and companionship by virtue of these two characteristics. However, it is not obtained by those who merely claim to be close companions of Allah such as priests or monks, or those who innovate into the legislation of Allah that which is foreign to it, claiming, “We are Allah’s close, chosen ones!”

So this companionship and loyalty from Allah which honors the servant is contained within these two great attributes: the true and correct belief (īmān)²⁰ and the constant, fearful consciousness of Allah (taqwá).²¹ The famous scholar of Islam, Ibn Taymiyyah, said regarding this verse (“Those who believe and are constantly, fearfully conscious (of Allah)”), “Whoever is a true believer who constantly remains conscious of Allah, then Allah will be an ally, a guardian, and a companion to him.” This is correct because the Quran also indicates this.


¹⁹ The Quran, Sūrah Yūnus, 10:62-63.
²⁰ Īmān is to have the correct belief in Allah, his angels, his Books, his messengers, the last day, and to believe in Allah’s pre-decree of everything, the good and bad of it. This was reported in a ḥadīth recorded by Muslim (no. 8). Īmān also consists of a belief in the heart, a statement on the tongue, and actions of the limbs.
²¹ A famous successor to the companions, Ṭalq Ibn Ḥabīb, was asked the meaning of taqwá to which he replied, “Taqwá is that you act in obedience to Allah, hoping for his mercy, upon a light from Allah; and taqwá is that you leave acts of disobedience to Allah out of fear of him, upon a light from Allhah.” This narration was reported by Ibn Abī Shaybah in “Kitāb al-Īmān” (no. 99) and al-Albānī declared it to be authentic.


The Explanation of:
وَلَا يَعِزُّ مَنْ عَادَيْتَ
“…and whomever you show enmity towards will never be honored.”

Meaning: Whoever is an enemy to Allah will never be honored. On the contrary, he will taste humiliation, regret, and failure. Allah ( سبحانه وتعالى ) says:

﴿ مَنْ كَانَ عَدُوًّا لِلَّهِ وَمَلَائِكَتِهِ وَرُسُلِهِ وَجِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَالَ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ عَدُوٌّ لِلْكَافِرِينَ ﴾
Whoever is an enemy to Allah, his angels, his messengers, Jibrīl and Mīkāl (two honored angels), then Allah is an enemy to the disbelievers.²²

Every disbeliever is in disgrace and worry. For this, if the Muslims actually possessed the true honor of Islam, the dignity of religion and the alliance and loyalty of Allah, the disbelievers would not be in the position they are now in which we find ourselves humiliated under them. We secretively look to them with honor and respect, while looking amongst ourselves with disgrace and shame. This is because most Muslims today unfortunately do not truly adhere to their religion, nor do they sincerely seek to correctly learn it. They rely solely upon the materialistic things of this life and its adornment. For this, we have been afflicted with such disgrace that the disbelievers are honored among themselves. However, we believe that the disbelievers are the enemies of Allah and that He has prescribed disgrace and shame upon all of His enemies as He says:

﴿ إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يُحَادُّونَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ أُولَئِكَ فِي الْأَذَلِّينَ ﴾
Indeed, those who oppose Allah and his messenger, they are the most humiliated.²³

This is something confirmed and destined to take place. Then Allah ( تعالى ) says:

﴿ كَتَبَ اللَّهُ لَأَغْلِبَنَّ أَنَا وَرُسُلِي إِنَّ اللَّهَ قَوِيٌّ عَزِيزٌ ﴾
Allah has decreed, “I will surely overcome, I and my messengers.” Indeed, Allah is powerful, exalted in might.²⁴

So whoever opposes Allah will eventually be humiliated and will never truly be honored except in the sense of someone imagining that honor is in that which the disbelievers have. As for the one who believes that the real honor and dignity is not obtained except by the close companionship and allegiance to Allah and by remaining steadfast upon his religion, then such a person sees those who disbelieve in Allah as none other than the most disgraced of Allah’s creatures.²⁵


²² The Quran, Sūrah al-Baqarah, 2:98.
²³ The Quran, Sūrah al-Mujādilah, 58:20.
²⁴ The Quran, Sūrah al-Mujādilah, 58:21.
²⁵ It should be understood that although the disbelievers will be disgraced for their rejection of Allah and his messengers and their denying Allah’s sole right of all worship, this is not justification for individual Muslims to take it upon themselves to pass judgment and seek to criminally harm them by any means.


The Explanation of:
تَبَارَكْتَ رَبَّنَا وَتَعَالَيْتَ
“Blessed are you, our lord, and you are exalted far above (any weakness).”

This is a form of praising and glorifying Allah by mentioning these two noble descriptions. All blessings are attributed to Allah as he is the possessor and provider of all blessings. “Blessed are you,” meaning: your goodness is unlimited and it encompasses the entire creation. Blessing, as we have previously mentioned, is anything good and continuous.

Our statement, “our lord,” confirms that we are addressing our lord, the only one worthy of all worship.

Our statement, “and you are exalted far above (any weakness),” contains the concept of Allah actually being high above, both personally and as a description in that his attributes are the highest characteristics.

So He is personally high above all creation and this concept of the highness of Allah is a personal, never-ending description. As for His rising over the throne, this is a description of action which occurs by his will and decision. The throne is the greatest of all creation, and over it Allah rose in a manner that befits his majesty and greatness. We do not seek to learn “how” this rising is,²⁶ nor do we believe it to be similar to or resembling the way any of creation would rise over something. The righteous predecessors (al-Salaf al-Ṣāliḥ) were unanimously agreed upon this belief based upon its supporting evidences in the Quran, the Sunnah, the intellect, and the natural inclination of all people.

As for the highness of Allah’s characteristics and attributes, this means Allah alone possesses the highest, most complete and perfect attributes and descriptions. And there is no deficiency whatsoever with any of them.

With that, this concise explanation of the Du’ā of Qunūt is complete by the success of Allah. May Allah send His peace and prayers upon our prophet, Muhammad, and upon his family, his companions, and his followers until the Day of Judgment.


²⁶ When asked about “how” Allah rose over his throne, the famous Imam Mālik replied, “The word istiwā, rising over, is not unknown, the ‘how’ of it is not comprehendible. Believing in it is required, and asking about it is an innovation…” See “Siyar ‘Alām al-Nubalā” by al-Dhahabī (8/100-101), “al-Asmā was-Ṣifāt” by al-Bayhaqī (page 515) and al-Ḥāfith (Ibn Ḥajr) declared it to be acceptable in “Fatḥ al-Bārī” (13/407).


Muḥammad Ibn Ṣāliḥ al-‘Uthaymīn, may Allah have mercy on him, was asked:

Question: Is it permissible to add additional words to this du’ā which the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) taught al-Ḥasan Ibn ‘Alī ( رضي الله عنه )?

Answer: There is no problem should a person wish to increase this Du’ā of Qunūt during the Witr prayer with additional words. If he were alone (in prayer), then he may also supplicate with whatever words he likes. However, it is preferable for a person to choose comprehensive and general supplications as the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) used to supplicate with comprehensive, general supplications and other times would supplicate with more specific ones. It is also incumbent upon the one leading the prayer to not prolong it upon the people so as to not put a burden or hardship upon them.²⁷

Question: Ibn al-‘Uthaymīn, may Allah have mercy on him, was also asked about a person who supplicates to Allah yet is not immediately answered. He may say, “I supplicate but it is not answered.”

Answer: All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and I send peace and prayers upon our prophet, Muhammad, upon his family, and upon his companions. I ask Allah ( سبحانه وتعالى ) to bestow upon my brothers and me success in following that which is correct in the principles of faith, statement, and action.

Allah ( تعالى ) says:

﴿ وَقَالَ رَبُّكُمُ ادْعُونِي أَسْتَجِبْ لَكُمْ إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَسْتَكْبِرُونَ عَنْ عِبَادَتِي سَيَدْخُلُونَ جَهَنَّمَ دَاخِرِينَ ﴾
And your lord said, “Call upon me, I will answer you.” Indeed, those who reject my worship will enter hell humiliated, disgraced.²⁸

The questioner says he supplicates to Allah yet Allah does not respond to him. So this reality presents a problem and confusion for him when compared with this noble verse in which Allah promises to answer the one who calls upon him, and Allah never breaks a promise. The answer to this is that there are conditions that must be fulfilled for one’s supplication to be answered.

The First Condition: Sincerity to Allah in that the person sincerely calls upon Allah alone, turning to him with an attentive and truthful heart. He must be earnest while asking him, knowing with certainty that Allah ( سبحانه وتعالى ) is completely capable of responding to his call, and hoping and expecting him to answer.

The Second Condition: The person must feel that while supplicating, he is in dire need of Allah ( عزّ وجلّ ), and that Allah alone is the only one who hears and answers the call of the one calling upon him. As for someone calling upon Allah while feeling himself self-sufficient without Allah and not in dire need of him, yet he merely supplicates out of habit or to test the effect, then such a person is not worthy of a response.

The Third Condition: The person must take all precaution to avoid eating anything forbidden because eating that which is impermissible prevents one’s supplications from being answered as has been established in an authentic ḥadīth that the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) said:

إِنَّ اللَّهَ طَيِّبٌ لَا يَقْبَلُ إِلَّا طَيِّبًا وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ أَمَرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ بِمَا أَمَرَ بِهِ الْمُرْسَلِينَ فَقَالَ:
Indeed, Allah is good and only accepts that which is good. And Allah commands the believers with the same things he commands the messengers; he said:

﴿ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا كُلُوا مِنْ طَيِّبَاتِ مَا رَزَقْنَاكُمْ وَاشْكُرُوا لِلَّهِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ إِيَّاهُ تَعْبُدُونَ ﴾
Oh you who believe, eat of the good things we have provided for you and be grateful to Allah if it is him that you worship.²⁹

And He ( عزّ وجلّ ) says:

﴿ يَا أَيُّهَا الرُّسُلُ كُلُوا مِنَ الطَّيِّبَاتِ وَاعْمَلُوا صَالِحًا إِنِّي بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ عَلِيمٌ ﴾
Oh messengers, eat from the good foods and work righteousness. Surely, I know what you do.³⁰

ثُمَّ ذَكَرَ الرَّجُلَ يُطِيلُ السَّفَرَ أَشْعَثَ أَغْبَرَ يَمُدُّ يَدَيْهِ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ يَا رَبِّ يَا رَبِّ وَمَطْعَمُهُ حَرَامٌ وَمَشْرَبُهُ حَرَامٌ وَمَلْبَسُهُ حَرَامٌ وَغُذِيَ بِالْحَرَامِ فَأَنَّى يُسْتَجَابُ لِذَلِكَ؟
He (the prophet) then mentioned a man who, having traveled far, is messy and dusty. He stretches his hands to the sky saying, “Oh lord, oh lord,” yet his food is forbidden (ḥarām) and his clothes are forbidden. He is nourished by that which is forbidden, so why would he be answered?³¹

The prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) excluded such a man from being answered even though he actually fulfilled some of the physical means by which supplication is answered, and they are:

  1. Raising the hands towards the sky, meaning to Allah, because he is above the heavens, above the throne. Stretching out the hands to Allah is one of the means of having one’s supplication answered and this has been reported in a ḥadīth:

إِنَّ اللَّهَ حَيِيٌّ كَرِيمٌ يَسْتَحْيِي إِذَا رَفَعَ الرَّجُلُ إِلَيْهِ يَدَيْهِ أَنْ يَرُدَّهُمَا صِفْرًا خَائِبَتَيْنِ
Indeed, Allah is shy and generous. He is shy, when a man raises his hands to him, to return them empty and rejected.³²

  1. This man supplicated to Allah using the name “lord” by saying, “Oh lord, oh lord.” Seeking nearness to Allah by this name is also one of the ways servant has his supplication answered. The lord is the creator, the owner, and the arranger of all affairs. In his hand is the control of the heavens and earth. For this reason, you find that most of the supplications in the noble Quran contain this name:

﴿ رَبَّنَا إِنَّنَا سَمِعْنَا مُنَادِيًا يُنَادِي لِلْإِيمَانِ أَنْ آمِنُوا بِرَبِّكُمْ فَآمَنَّا رَبَّنَا فَاغْفِرْ لَنَا ذُنُوبَنَا وَكَفِّرْ عَنَّا سَيِّئَاتِنَا وَتَوَفَّنَا مَعَ الْأَبْرَارِ رَبَّنَا وَآتِنَا مَا وَعَدْتَنَا عَلَى رُسُلِكَ وَلَا تُخْزِنَا يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ إِنَّكَ لَا تُخْلِفُ الْمِيعَادَ فَاسْتَجَابَ لَهُمْ رَبُّهُمْ أَنِّي لَا أُضِيعُ عَمَلَ عَامِلٍ مِنْكُمْ مِنْ ذَكَرٍ أَوْ أُنْثَى بَعْضُكُمْ مِنْ بَعْضٍ فَالَّذِينَ هَاجَرُوا وَأُخْرِجُوا مِنْ دِيَارِهِمْ وَأُوذُوا فِي سَبِيلِي وَقَاتَلُوا وَقُتِلُوا لَأُكَفِّرَنَّ عَنْهُمْ سَيِّئَاتِهِمْ وَلَأُدْخِلَنَّهُمْ جَنَّاتٍ تَجْرِي مِنْ تَحْتِهَا الْأَنْهَارُ ثَوَابًا مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ وَاللَّهُ عِنْدَهُ حُسْنُ الثَّوَابِ ﴾
Our lord, indeed, we have heard a caller (Prophet Muhammad) calling to faith, saying, “Believe in your lord,” so we have believed. Our lord, so forgive us our sins and remove from us our misdeeds and cause us to die with the righteous people. Our lord, and grant us what you promised us through your messengers and do not disgrace us on the Day of Resurrection. Indeed, you do not fail in your promise. And their lord responded to them, “Never will I allow to be lost the work of any worker among you, whether male or female; you are all of one another. So those who immigrated, driven out from their homes, harmed in my cause, fought, or were killed – I will surely remove from them their misdeeds, and I will surely admit them into gardens beneath which rivers flow as a reward from Allah. And Allah has with him the best reward.”³³

So seeking nearness to Allah by using the name, “lord” is one of the ways a person can ensure his supplication is responded to.

  1. This man (in the ḥadīth on pg. 28) was traveling and most of the time, traveling on a journey is a time in which supplications are answered. This is because when one is journeying, he usually feels a sense of need and reliance upon Allah more than when he is at home, safe and secure with his family. This was even more so especially traveling during those times.

The prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) mentioned in the ḥadīth that this man was, “…messy and dusty,” meaning that he was not in the normal state he usually is and it was as if the most important thing to him at that time was turning to Allah and supplicating to him no matter what state he was in, whether untidy and dusty or comfortable in luxury. And this state of being messy and dusty may have some affect on one’s supplication being responded to due to the ḥadīth in which the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) said that Allah descends to the lowest heaven on the day of ‘Arafah, boasting to the angels of those who stand and supplicate to him, saying:

انْظُرُوا إِلَى عِبَادِي أَتَوْنِي شُعْثًا غُبْرًا
“Look at my servants. They have come to me (even while) uncombed and dusty.”³⁴

Even while fulfilling all of these means of having his supplication answered, they did not benefit him at all because his food was forbidden, his clothing forbidden, and he was completely nourished by forbidden means. So the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) said, “So why would he be answered?”

So these are some conditions that, when not fulfilled, may cause one’s supplication to seem unanswered. However, if they are fulfilled and still Allah does not immediately respond to the caller, then that is because of a certain reason and Allah’s wisdom that he knows yet the caller may be unaware of. And it is possible that we love and want something but it is really bad for us. So if one tries his best to fulfill the conditions of supplication, yet he feels he is not immediately responded to, then it may be that Allah will instead prevent some greater evil from befalling him, or he may save the reward and response until the Day of Resurrection on which he will repay with increased rewards. So if he fulfills the conditions but is still neither answered due to Allah’s wisdom nor is a greater evil prevented from afflicting him, then he will be given a reward twice – once for his act of worship by supplicating to Allah alone, and once for his trouble and grief of not having his supplication immediately answered. So Allah will save for him that which is greater and more complete.

Also, one must not consider the response to his supplication to be slow for this is actually one of the ways of preventing supplications from being accepted and answered. This is based on a ḥadīth in which the prophet ( صلّى الله عليه وسلّم ) said:

يُسْتَجَابُ لِأَحَدِكُمْ مَا لَمْ يَعْجَلْ يَقُولُ دَعَوْتُ فَلَمْ يُسْتَجَبْ لِي
Each of you will be answered as long as he is not hasty, saying, “I supplicated but it was not answered for me.”³⁵

So a person should not try to rush the response. He should also not despair and then stop supplicating. Rather, he should persist in calling upon Allah because each time someone supplicates to him, it is a form of worship by which he draws nearer to Allah and is thus rewarded.

So, my brother, you must stay constant on sincerely calling upon Allah ( عزّ وجلّ ) alone in all of your affairs, the general and specific, the minor and critical matters. And even if there was nothing other than the fact that calling upon Allah is worship, then it would definitely be worthwhile for a person to remain steadfast on this action. And with Allah lies all success.


²⁷ Taken from “Majmū’ Fatāwá wa Rasāil” (14/138).
²⁸ The Quran, Sūrah Ghāfir, 40:60.
²⁹ The Quran, Sūrah al-Baqarah, 2:172.
³⁰ The Quran, Sūrah al-Mu’minūn, 22:51.
³¹ The ḥadīth was recorded by Muslim (no. 1015).
³² Recorded by al-Tirmidhī (no. 3809) and al-Albānī said it is authentic in “Ṣaḥīḥ Sunan al-Tirmidhī” (no. 2819), Abū Dāwūd, “Ṣaḥīḥ Sunan Abī Dāwūd” (no. 1320), Ibn Mājah “Ṣaḥīḥ Sunan Ibn Mājah” (no. 3117), and by Aḥmad.
³³ The Quran, Sūrah Āli-‘Imrān, 3:193-195.
³⁴ Recorded by Aḥmad (no. 7049).
³⁵ This Hadeeth is recorded by Al-Bukhaaree (no. 6340), Muslim (no. 2735), At-Tirmithee (no. 3387), Abu Daawood (no. 1484), Ibn Maajah (no. 3853) and by Imaam Ahmad.


اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي فِيمَنْ هَدَيْتَ
Allāhumma ihdinī fīman hadayt
Oh Allah, guide me with those You have guided


وَعَافِنِي فِيمَنْ عَافَيْتَ
wa ‘āfinī fīman ‘āfayt
And heal me with those you have healed


وَتَوَلَّنِي فِيمَنْ تَوَلَّيْتَ
wa tawallanī fīman tawallayt
And care for me with those You have cared for

وَبَارِكْ لِي فِيمَا أَعْطَيْتَ
wa bārik lī fīmā ā’ṭayt
And bless me in what you have given

وَقِنِي شَرَّ مَا قَضَيْتَ
wa qinī sharra mā qaḍayt
And protect me from the evil of what you have decreed

إِنَّكَ تَقْضِي وَلَا يُقْضَى عَلَيْكَ
innaka taqḍī wa lā yuqḍá ‘alayk
Indeed, you decree while no one decrees against you

وَإِنَّهُ لَا يَذِلُّ مَنْ وَالَيْتَ
wa innahu lā yadhillu man wālayt
And whomever you show loyalty towards will never be humiliated

وَلَا يَعِزُّ مَنْ عَادَيْتَ
wa lā ya’izzu man ‘ādayt
And whomever you show enmity towards will never be honored

تَبَارَكْتَ رَبَّنَا وَتَعَالَيْتَ
tabārakta rabbanā wa ta‘ālayt
Blessed are you, our lord, and you are exalted far above (any weakness)

 

Explaining Surah an-Naba – Shaykh ibn Uthaymeen

Explaining Sūrah an-Naba
تفسري جزء عمّ :Original Title
Original Author: Muḥammad Ibn Ṣāliḥ al-‘Uthaymīn
Translator : Abu az-Zubayr Harrison – authentic-translations.com

Contents

Sūrah al-Naba: Verses 1-16
The Explanation of Verses 1-16
Sūrah al-Naba: Verses 17-30
The Explanation of Verses 17-30
Sūrah al-Naba: Verses 31-36
The Explanation of Verses 31-36
Sūrah al-Naba: Verses 37-40
The Explanation of Verses 37-40

Click the below link to read or download PDF document

Explaining Surah an-Naba – Shaykh Uthaymeen- Authentic-Translations.com [PDF]

Explaining Surah al-Fatihah – Shaykh ibn Uthaymeen

Explaining Sūrah al-Fātiḥah
تفسري سورة الفاحتة :Original Title
Original Author: Muḥammad Ibn Ṣāliḥ al-‘Uthaymīn
Translator : Abu az-Zubayr Harrison – authentic-translations.com

Contents

Sūrah al-Fātiḥah
Introduction
The Explanation of: In the name of Allah, the Most-Merciful, the Bestower of all mercy
The Explanation of Verse 1: All praise and thanks are for Allah, the lord of all creations
The Explanation of Verse 2: The Most-Merciful, the Bestower of all mercy
The Explanation of Verse 3: The owner of the Day of Recompense
The Explanation of Verse 4: You alone we worship, and from you alone we seek help
The Explanation of Verse 5: Guide us to the straight path
The Explanation of Verses 6 and 7: The path of those you bestowed grace upon

Click the below link to read or download the full article PDF:

Explaining Surah al-Fatihah – Shaykh Uthaymeen- Authentic-Translations.com [PDF]

The Ruling on the one who abandons Prayer – Shaykh al-Albaani

Part 1

source: silsilat ul-hudā wa nnūr ~ the series of guidance and light ~ tape no. 8

Question #5: “What is the ruling on the one who abandons the prayer? And what is the difference between al-kufr ul-ʽamalī [1] (the disbelief related to actions) and al-kufr ul-ʽitiqādī [2] (the disbelief related to faith)?”

Shaykh al-Albānī answers:

“The one who abandons the prayer has two states: either he believes in its legislation, or he denies its legislation. So regarding this second state, he is a disbeliever by the consensus of the Muslims. And likewise, whoever denies a matter from the religion that a Muslim cannot be ignorant about – for example, whoever denies (the legislation of) fasting, Hajj and whatever else there is of matters known by all the Muslims to be necessities of the religion – then he is a disbeliever. So there is no difference of opinion about this: whoever denies the legislation of the prayer is a disbeliever.

But if there is a man who does not deny (the legislation) of the prayer and who acknowledges its legislation, but with respect to action, he does not perform it, he does not pray – maybe he does not pray at all and maybe he prays sometimes – so in this case, if we said that this man has disbelieved, this statement would not apply to him at all, because kufr (disbelief) is denial, and he is not denying the legislation of the prayer, as (Allāh), the Most High, said with regard

to the disbelievers: {And they denied them (those Āyāt)…, though their ownselves were convinced thereof}. [3]
So if we take as an example so-and-so from the people who does not pray, but when he is asked ‘Why don’t you pray O my brother?’, he says to you, ‘Allāh will forgive me, by Allāh the worldly life has kept me busy, these children have kept me busy,’ and this type of talk. Of course, this talk is not an excuse for him at all, but he presents us a benefit which we didn’t know because we can’t know what is in his heart. He presents us a benefit that the man believes in the legislation of the prayer, as opposed to if the answer was, may Allāh forbid: ‘O my brother, the time for this prayer is gone; this was during a time when the people were not educated, they were unclean, they were in need of a specific nature of cleanliness, purity and exercise, and now the time for this has gone; now there are new means that free us of prayer’ – this (man) has disbelieved and thus (goes) to {Hell, and worst indeed is that destination}. [4]  As for if the answer is the first (example): ‘Why don’t you pray?’ (and he says,) ‘Allāh will forgive us, may Allāh curse the shaytān,’ and this type of talk that informs us that the man is not denying the legislation of the prayer, then if we said that this man is a disbeliever, we would be contradicting the reality, because this man is a believer, a believer in the legislation of the prayer and a believer in all of Islām, so how can we declare him a disbeliever?

Therefore, we say that there is no difference between the one who abandons the prayer and the one who abandons fasting and the one who abandons Hajj and the one who abandons anything from the acts of worship related to actions – (there is no difference) with regard to (judging whether) he is to be declared a disbeliever or not. When is he declared a disbeliever? If he denies. When is he not declared a disbeliever? If he believes. So it is not allowed – by consensus – to declare the believer to be a disbeliever. And many narrations have come in accordance with this…: ‘(Allāh will say:) Make whoever (sincerely) said lā ilāha illAllāh (none has the right to be worshiped but Allāh) enter Paradise,’ while he does not have a (good) deed equal to the weight of an atom, but he has the weight of an atom of īmān (faith), so this īmān is what prevents him from dwelling in the Fire forever, and he enters Paradise even if it is after he becomes a black coal. [5] However, this is the one who bears witness that none has the right to be worshiped but Allāh and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allāh, and he believes in all that has come from Allāh and His Messenger ; but he does not pray, or does not fast or does not perform Hajj or the like, or he steals or fornicates – there is no difference with regard to all these affairs when placed on the scales of disbelief related to actions and disbelief related to faith [because since he has faith, these impermissible actions do not fall under disbelief related to faith / major kufr].

For instance, a man commits fornication; do we declare him a disbeliever? You will say, no. I say, no. Don’t be hasty. We have to see, does he say that zinā (fornication) is prohibited? Does he say as some of the ignorant ones say: ‘there is no harām and there is no halāl’? If he says to me (such a) statement, he has disbelieved. Likewise, the one who steals and any (other) sin – for example, the man who backbites people, and we say to him: ‘Fear Allāh, the Messenger (of Allāh) said: ‘Backbiting is you mentioning about

your brother that which he dislikes,’6 and he says: ‘There is no ‘the Messenger said’ and such-and-such,’ (then) he has disbelieved. In this manner, (the same applies to) all the Islamically legislated rulings, whether it is a positive ruling, i.e., one of the obligatory duties, or a negative ruling, i.e., the prohibitions that he must keep away from. So, if he regards any of these prohibitions to be permissible in his heart, he has disbelieved. But if he falls into it by way of action while believing that he is disobeying (Allāh), he has not disbelieved.

So there is no difference with regard to this between all the Islamically legislated rulings, whether they are from the obligatory duties or prohibitions. The obligatory duties must be carried out and it is not permissible to leave them off, but whoever leaves them out of laziness, it is not allowed to declare him a disbeliever. Whoever leaves them out of denial has disbelieved; whoever regards any of the forbidden things to be permissible has likewise disbelieved. There is no difference with regard to this at all between the obligations and prohibitions.”

1 i.e., minor kufr
2 i.e., major kufr
3 Sūrat un-Naml, 27:14
4 Sūrah Āl ʽImrān, 3:162
5 Sahīh al-Bukhārī #7439, #7510, #6560; Sahīh at-Targhīb #3639, #3641
6 Sahīh Muslim #2589

Part 2

source: silsilat ul-ahaadeeth is-saheeha – the series of authentic narrations – hadeeth no. 87

~

Hudhaifa bin al-Yamaan (radiAllaahu ‘anhu) said that the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: “Islaam will be erased just as the decoration of a garment is (worn out and) erased, until it will not be known what is fasting, nor prayer, nor the rituals of Hajj, nor charity; and the Book of Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, (i.e., the Qur’aan) will be taken away (from the mus-hafs[1] and breasts of the people)[2] in one night such that not (even) an aayah from it will remain on earth. And groups of people will remain – the old people – saying: ‘We saw our forefathers upon this statement: ‘laa ilaaha illAllaah (none has the right to worshiped but Allaah),’ so we also say it.’”

(Then), Silah bin Zufar said to Hudhaifa: ‘What will ‘laa ilaaha illAllaah’ benefit them when they don’t know what is prayer, nor fasting, nor the rituals of Hajj, nor charity?’ Hudhaifa turned away from him. Then (Silah) repeated it to (Hudhaifa) three times, and every time Hudhaifa would turn away from him. Then he turned toward him on the third time and said three times: ‘O Silah! It will save them from the Fire.’”[3]

~*~*~*~

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) comments:

“There is an important benefit of fiqh in the hadeeth, which is that bearing witness that laa ilaaha illAllaah (none has the right to be worshiped but Allaah) saves the one who says it (sincerely) from dwelling forever in the Fire on the Day of Resurrection, even if he didn’t use to perform any of the other pillars of Islaam at all, such as prayer and so on. And it is known that the scholars have differed about the ruling on the one who abandons the prayer especially while believing in its legislation. So the majority was of the opinion that he has not disbelievedby that, but rather disobeyed Allaah; and Ahmad – in a report – was of the opinion that he has disbelieved, and that he is to be killed due to apostasy, not as a prescribed punishment. And it is has been authentically narrated from the Companions that they did not consider leaving any of the actions to be disbelief except the prayer; at-Tirmithee and al-Haakim reported it.[4]

And I believe that that which is correct is the view of the majority, and that what was mentioned from the Companions does not clearly state that they meant by ‘disbelief’ here to be the disbelief which will make its possessor dwell forever in the Fire and for which it is not possible that Allaah will forgive him. How can that be when this is Hudhaifa bin al-Yamaan – who is one of the foremost of those Companions – responding to Silah bin Zufar, who was about to understand the affair as Ahmad’s understanding of it. So (Silah) said: ‘What will ‘laa ilaaha illAllaah’ benefit them when they don’t know what is prayer. . .,’ then Hudhaifa replied to him after his turning away from him, saying three times: ‘O Silah! It will save them from the Fire.’ Therefore, this is a clear statement from Hudhaifa (radiAllaahu ‘anhu) that the one who abandons the prayer is not a disbeliever [if he believes in its legislation], but rather a Muslim who will be saved from dwelling forever in the Fire on the Day of Resurrection. So be mindful of this, for indeed you may not find it in other than this place.”

[1] the actually plural word in Arabic for mus-haf is masaahif, i.e., copies of the Qur’aan
[2] this explanation and detail in the parentheses was mentioned by Shaykh ‘Abd ul-Muhsin al-‘Abbaad in Sharh Sunan ibn Maajah, tape #293
[3] also refer to Saheeh ibn Maajah #3289
[4] Saheeh at-Tirmithee #2622

Part 3

source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light tape no. 81

~

Question #10: “What about the hadeeth: ‘whoever abandons the prayer has disbelieved’?”[1]

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers:

This is not the first hadeeth in which it is said that whoever does such-and-such has disbelieved. You have the famous hadeeth ‘whoever swears by other than Allaah has disbelieved,’[2] but we don’t say that whoever says ‘by the life of my father’ has apostatized from his religion.[3] And you know, for example, thehadeeth of ‘Umar bin al-Khattaab in Saheeh al-Bukhaari when the Messenger (of Allaah) (‘alayhi ssalaam) heard him swearing by his father, so he (‘alayhi ssalaam) said: ‘Don’t swear by your fathers; whoever of you swears, then let him swear by Allaah or keep silent.’[4] And in the hadeeth of (‘Umar’s) son ‘Abdullaah bin ‘Umar, he said that the Messenger (of Allaah) (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: ‘Whoever swears by other than Allaah has associated partners with Him,’[5] and in another narration, ‘he has disbelieved.’

So it is not necessary for the occurrence of the expression ‘whoever does such-and-such has disbelieved’ to mean that he has disbelieved with the disbelief of apostasy. Rather, it can have many meanings, such as for example: ‘he has disbelieved’ can mean that he is close to disbelieving, that he has disbelieved with the disbelief related to (only) actions (i.e., minor kufr), and such meanings that the people of knowledge were obliged to (apply) in order to reconcile between the texts.

‘Whoever abandons the prayer has disbelieved.’ (But also) we say, ‘whoever sayslaa ilaaha illAllaah[6] (sincerely) will enter Paradise;’[7] ‘whoever says laa ilaaha illAllaah (sincerely), it will benefit him some day,’[8] [9] as mentioned in thehadeeth of al-Bazzaar and others. (Another hadeeth mentions that) ‘whichever slave runs away from his master has disbelieved.’[10] These expressions are very numerous: ‘he has disbelieved, he has disbelieved.’ And there isn’t any hadeeththat is interpreted like this upon its apparent meaning if it comes with the expression: ‘he has disbelieved.’ This hadeeth – ‘whoever abandons the prayer has disbelieved’ – is treated the same way as the other narrations which share the saying ‘he has disbelieved’ with the hadeeth about prayer. So here, many interpretations can occur for this text as for many (other) narrations. For example, ‘the tale-carrier[11] will not enter Paradise,’[12] (but) does that mean that he has disbelieved because of his tale-carrying? The answer is: if he considers that to be permissible by his heart, then Paradise has been forbidden for him. And if he acknowledges the forbiddance of that, and admits that he is wrong, a sinner and an evildoer, then his affair is with Allaah, as He, the Mighty and Majestic, said: ‘Verily, Allaah forgives not that partners should be set up with Him (in worship), but He forgives except that (anything else) to whom He wills.’[13] So abandoning the prayer is an action that leads its doer to die upon other thaneemaan (faith) – and Allaah’s protection is sought. And abandoning the prayer is from the characteristics of the disbelievers who don’t pray and don’t give thezakaah (obligatory charity). Hence, if the Muslim does not pray, he has resembled the disbelievers. So his disbelief here is the disbelief related to actions [as long as he believes in the legislation of the prayer]. And the narrations which must be explained (with regard to their true meanings) are very numerous.

For instance, during the farewell pilgrimage, (the Prophet) (‘alayhi ssalaat was salaam) ordered Jareer bin ‘Abdillaah al-Bajalee to quiet the people down and make them listen, and he (‘alayhi ssalaam) said while addressing them: ‘Do not return to being disbelievers after me by striking the necks of one another.’[14]And he (‘alayhi ssalaat was salaam) said: ‘Insulting a Muslim is disobedience (to Allaah), and fighting him is disbelief.’[15] But if a Muslim kills or fights another Muslim, has this (person) apostatized from his religion? The answer is: no, because Allaah said: {And if two parties or groups among the believers fall to fighting, then make peace between them both. But if one of them outrages against the other, then fight you (all) against the one that which outrages till it complies with the Command of Allah}.[16] He considered each of the two groups – the one outraging and the one being outraged – to be from the believers, although the Messenger (of Allaah) said in the previous hadeeth that ‘insulting a Muslim is disobedience (to Allaah) and fighting him is disbelief.’ So how is disbelief interpreted here? It is minor disbelief; it is disbelief related to actions. And the narrations about prayer – which declare that the one who abandons the prayer has disbelieved – are also (interpreted) likewise: either it is said that he is close to the disbelief related to faith (i.e., major kufr), that he is close to dying upon other than the religion of Islaam, or (it is said) that he has disbelieved with the disbelief related to actions. This interpretation is necessary so that we don’t contradict the narrations of the Messenger (of Allaah) (‘alayhi ssalaam) with one another.”


[1] Saheeh at-Tirmithee #2621
[2] Saheeh at-Tirmithee #1535
[3] swearing by other than Allaah can become major disbelief when the one swearing believes that the one whom he falsely swears by has the ability to avert harm from him and the like; refer to The Methodology of the Saved Sect by Shaykh Muhammad bin Jameel Zaynoo, p. 101
[4] Saheeh an-Nasaa’ee #3775, Saheeh aj-Jaami’ #1923
[5] Saheeh at-Tirmithee #1535
[6] none has the right to be worshiped but Allaah
[7] Silsilat ul-Ahaadeeth is-Saheeha #2355
[8] i.e., even if he first enters the Fire to be punished therein
[9] Saheeh aj-Jaami’ #6434
[10] Saheeh Muslim #68
[11] the tale-carrier is the one who spreads the speech of the people among one another with the intention of causing corruption, such as you going to someone and saying: ‘such-and-such person insulted you, and he said such-and-such thing about you, etc’ so that you separate between them; refer to Shaykh Muhammad bin Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen in Noorun ‘alaa ddarb tape #48a and Silsilatu Liqaa il-Baab il-Maftooh tape #93a
[12] Saheeh al-Bukhaari #6056, Saheeh Muslim #105
[13] Surat un-Nisaa, 4:48
[14] Saheeh al-Bukhaari #4405
[15] Saheeh al-Bukhaari #6044
[16] Surat ul-Hujuraat, 49:9

Part 4

source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light tape no. 323

~

Question #23: “Our Shaykh, I am asking you about the issue of proofs with regard to the ruling on the one who abandons the prayer. In the treatise ‘The ruling on the one who abandons prayer’ by Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen, he is of the opinion that the one who abandons the prayer is a disbeliever, and he has many proofs, such as Allaah’s statement about the mushrikoon:[1] {But if they repent, perform salaah (the prayer), and give zakaah (obligatory charity), then they are your brethren in religion}.[2] So he says that what is understood from the aayah is that if they don’t do that, they are not our brethren; and the religious brotherhood isn’t negated by sins even if they are great, but it is negated when one leaves Islaam”

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers:

“Yet he is not saying that if the person prays but doesn’t give the zakaah that he is (likewise) not a Muslim and that he has disbelieved by that. May Allaah guide you, you are bringing his proof but I would like to turn your attention to (the fact) thatthere is no proof in it because he is not saying about the one who abandons thezakaah the same as he is saying about the one who abandons the prayer. You didn’t just narrate his opinion, rather you narrated (both) his opinion and his proof, but I would like to turn your attention to (the fact) that this is not a proof for him, because the aayah includes zakaah along with the prayer, [yet he is differentiating between the one who abandons the former and the one who abandons the latter].”

Question #23 (continued): “What is the ruling on this man who has abandoned the prayer, not out of denying (its legislation) but out of laziness? And what is thedaleel (evidence)?”

Shaykh al-Albaani answers:

“This (man) is one who is rebellious and disobedient (to Allaah), and not a disbeliever. The daleel is that ‘Whoever says laa ilaaha illAllaah[3] (sincerely) will enter Paradise,’[4] and the daleel is that ‘Allaah has prescribed five prayers upon (His) slaves, so whoever performs them and does them well, and completes theirrukoo’ (bowing), sujood (prostration) and khushoo’ (submissive humility and attentiveness), then he has a covenant with Allaah that He will enter him into Paradise, and whoever does not perform them and does not complete their rukoo’,sujood and khushoo’, then he does not have a covenant with Allaah; If He wills, He will punish him and if He wills, He will forgive him,’[5] and if he was a disbeliever, He would not forgive him because Allaah says: ‘Verily, Allah forgives not that partners should be set up with Him (in worship), but He forgives except that (anything else) to whom He wills.’”[6]


[1] those who associate partners with Allaah
[2] Surat ut-Tawbah, 9:11
[3] none has the right to be worshiped but Allaah
[4] Silsilat ul-Ahaadeeth is-Saheeha #2355
[5] Saheeh ibn Maajah #1158, Saheeh at-Targheeb #400, Hukm Taarik is-Salaah p. 46
[6] Surat un-Nisaa, 4:48

~

asaheeha translations

The Istikhaara Prayer – Shaykh al-Albaani

Source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light – tape no. 206 (a), tape no. 664 (b), tape no. 426 (c)

~

*Question #10: (a) “What should the one making istikhaara[1] prayer say if he has two affairs on the same level and does not have an inclination toward either one, meaning 50-50?”

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers: “What I understand from your question is that he does not have an intention (to do something),[2] therefore there is no istikhaara prayer upon him.”

*Question #10: (a) “Is the istikhaara prayer legislated for one who is confused about doing something or is it legislated for one who has made up his mind to do so?”

Shaykh al-Albaani answers: “No, the istikhaara prayer does not remove confusion. Istikhaara prayer is (done) after a person has made up his mind to do something; so here, istikhaara is performed. Istikhaara prayer is not legislated for removing doubt and uncertainty regarding a matter which the Muslim has not made up his mind about.”

*Question #5: (b) “Is the du’aa (supplication) of istikhaara prayer before thetasleem or after it?”

Shaykh al-Albaani answers: “After the tasleem.

*Question #12: (c) “Is it allowed to repeat the istikhaara prayer?”

Shaykh al-Albaani answers: “It is allowed if his istikhaara prayer was not (performed in the way in which it is) legislated, and it is enough for it to be not legislated if he makes istikhaara to his Lord by (merely) his words, and not by his heart. And he himself is aware of this inattentiveness, so then he is forced to repeat (the istikhaara prayer). As for if he himself did not feel any of that, then he has innovated (if he repeats it).”


[1] istikhaara means to seek (from Allaah) that which is best regarding something
[2] this is in reference to the actual wording of the hadeeth in which the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: “If one of you intends to do something, then let him pray two ra’kah, then say [the du’aa of istikhaara]“; Saheeh al-Bukhaari #6382

~

asaheeha translations

Watch Video Here

Zamzam Water and the Answered Supplication – Shaykh al-Albaani

source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light – tape no. 814

~

Question #13: “The du’aa (supplication) is answered when drinking zamzamwater, so is this particularly in Makkah or in any place?”

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers:

“The first one (i.e., particularly in Makkah) is that which I consider to be correct.”

~

asaheeha translations

The Place of Looking in Rukoo – Shaykh al-Albaani

We don’t have to look at a certain spot during rukoo`

Q: “Where does the one praying look during rukoo` (bowing)?”

Shaikh al-Albaani:

He is not obliged to look at a certain spot like he should when he is standing and when he is sitting for the tashahhud. So when he is standing, he looks at the place of his prostration; and when he is sitting during the tashahhud, he looks at his (right index) finger. But during rukoo`, there isn’t a specific spot toward which we were commanded to look, so the matter is unrestricted.”

[mutafarriqaat 1/8 / asaheeha translations]

Loving Allaah and gaining His Love – Shaykh al-Albaani

Source: bidaayat us-sool fi tafdheel ir-rasool – …the superiority of the Messenger (of Allaah) (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) – page no. 5-7

~

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) says in his introduction:

“Know, O Muslim brother, that it is not possible for anyone to rise to this station of loving Allaah and His Messenger [sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam] except bytawheed (singling out) of Allaah, the Most High, alone in His worship, and by singling out the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) alone for following from among the servants of Allaah, due to (Allaah’s) statement: ‘He who obeys the Messenger (Muhammad (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam)) has indeed obeyed Allaah’[1] and His statement ‘Say (O Muhammad (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam)to mankind): ‘If you (really) love Allaah then follow me (i.e. accept Islamic Monotheism, follow the Qur’aan and the Sunnah), Allaah will love you.’’[2] And (the Prophet) (‘alayhi ssalaat wa ssalaam) said: ‘No, by the One in whose Hand my soul is, if Moosaa was alive, he would have no choice but to follow me.’[3]

I say: so if someone like Moosaa, the one who Allaah spoke to (directly), cannot follow other than the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam), then can anyone else do that? Hence, this is one of the definite evidences of the obligation of singling out the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) in following, which is one of the requirements of the shahaada (testimony): ‘anna muhammad ar-rasoolullaah (that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allaah)’ [sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam]. Therefore, Allaah, the Blessed and Most High, in the before-mentioned aayah, made following him (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) alone to be a proof of Allaah’s love for (the follower). And there is no doubt that whoever Allaah loves, Allaah is with him in everything, as occurs in the authentichadeeth al-Qudsi:[4] ‘(Allaah says), ‘My slave does not come near to me with anything more beloved to me than that which I have made obligatory upon him, and My slave continues to come near me with supererogatory deeds until I love him; and when I love him, I am his hearing with which he hears, his sight with which he sees, his hand with which he grasps and his leg with which he walks.[5]And if he asks me, I will surely give him, and if he seeks refuge in Me, I will surely protect him . . .’[6]

And if this divine care is only for the beloved slave of Allaah, it is obligatory upon every Muslim to take the means which will make him beloved to Allaah, namely following the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) alone; and just by that, he will attain special care from his Mawlaa[7], the Blessed and Most High. Don’t you see that it is not possible to know the obligatory duties and distinguish them from the supererogatory acts except by following him (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) alone? And indeed there is no doubt that the more the Muslim learns about the biography of the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) and knows of his pleasant nature and virtues, the more his love for him [sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam] will be and the more extensive and comprehensive his following of him [sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam] will be.”

[1] Surat un-Nisaa, 4:80
[2] Surah Aal ‘Imraan, 3:31
[3] Shaykh al-Albaani adds the following footnote: “Ad-Daaramee, Ahmad andAbu Nu’aym narrated it from the hadeeth of Jaabir bin ‘Abdillaah, and it is ahasan (good) hadeeth as I clarified in ‘Al-Mishkaah’ and others”
[4] a hadeeth in which the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) narrates Allaah’s Speech from Him
[5] i.e., Allaah directs his hearing, sight, actions with his hand and his walking to only that which is good; refer to Explanatory Notes on Imaam an-Nawawee’sForty Ahaadeeth (Revisited) by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen(rahimahullaah), p. 250-251
[6] Saheeh al-Bukhaari #6502
[7] Lord, Helper, Protector, etc.; refer to Translation of the meanings of the Noble Qur’aan in the English Language by al-Hilaali/Khaan

~

asaheeha translations

Saying “wa maghfiratuh” – Shaykh al-Albaani

Source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light – tape no. 253

~

Question #2: “What is the authenticity of adding wa maghfiratuh[1] in offering thesalaam and responding to it?”

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers:

“There is no addition (of wa maghfiratuh) in the hadeeth with respect to offering the salaam; i.e., if a person starts with offering the salaam, he ends at wa barakaatuh: asalaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh. And thehadeeth that has come – or in more precise words, (the hadeeth) that was narrated – (stating) that at the fourth time, the fourth of them said, asalaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh wa maghfiratuh, then this is a weak narration. As for the addition (of wa maghfiratuh) in the response to wa barakaatuh, then it is established; i.e., a man says, asalaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh, then we add wa maghfiratuh in the response…

It is in agreement with the noble Qur’aan (with) the saying ‘When you are greeted with a greeting, greet in return with what is better than it, or (at least) return it equally.’[2] So if the greeter gives the salaam, saying asalaamu ‘alaykum wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh, the aayah that stated ‘greet in return with what is better than it’ is not invalidated; this command still exists, which is (followed by saying) wa maghfiratuh. This addition (with respect to responding) has also been mentioned in…narrations established from some of the Companions.

So we have brought out a conclusion whose summary is that adding wa maghfiratuh in the response is allowed and starting (the salaam with it) is not allowed.”

[1] saying ‘and His Forgiveness’ after the greeting ‘may Peace, Mercy and Blessings of Allaah be upon you’
[2] Surat un-Nisaa, 4:86

~

asaheeha translations

The Permissible Lying – Shaykh al-Albaani

source: silsilat ul-ahaadeeth is-saheeha – the series of authentic narrations –hadeeth no. 545

~

Umm Kulthum bint ‘Uqbah (radi Allaahu ‘anhaa) said: “the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) allowed lying in three (situations): during war, in reconciling between people, and the speech of a man to his wife. {In another narration:} the speech of a man to his wife and the speech of a woman to her husband.”

~*~*~*~

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) comments:[1]

“I say, it is not part of the permissible lying that (the man) promises (his wife) something that he does not intend to fulfill for her, or he tells her that he bought such and such thing for her with such and such price – i.e., more than the real (price) – for the purpose of pleasing her, because that may be revealed to her; then it will be a reason for her to think badly of her husband, and that is part of corruption, not rectification.”

[1] this commentary was taken from Silsilat ul-Ahaadeeth is-Saheeha #498

~

asaheeha translations

Deeds Multiplying in Ramadhaan – Shaykh al-Albaani

Source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light – tape no. 693

Question #11: “Are good deeds multiplied in general during Ramadhaan and likewise evil deeds?”

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers:

“This question is also often brought up regarding Makkah and the one residing in Makkah, whether he is a foreigner or a Makkan; are good deeds and evil deeds multiplied over there? The answer: there isn’t any text in the Islamic legislation clearly (stating) that good deeds are multiplied, and likewise evil deeds, due to the excellence of a (certain) place or the excellence of a (certain) time; excellence of a place like Makkah and Madinah for example (and) excellence of a time like this month of ours, the month of Ramadhaan. There isn’t any clear text about good deeds or evil deeds being multiplied (in such cases). But some of the scholars, by way of deduction, say that they are multiplied – by way of deduction, i.e., not based on a text but rather by way of ijtihaad.[1] So if someone says that good deeds are multiplied, there is no harm in that because it is the saying of some of the scholars. But it is not allowed to be absolutely certain about that due to the nonexistence of (relevant evidence mentioned in) the holy text which ‘falsehood cannot come to from before it or behind it.’”[2]

[1] independent reasoning
[2] Surah Fussilat, 41:42

~

asaheeha translations

Rulings on the Prostrations of Forgetfulness – Shaykh al-Albaani

Q: “What is the criterion for this forgetting (due to which we must perform the two prostrations of forgetfulness)? Is it any forgetting in prayer even if he, for example, adds something, omits something…?”

Shaikh al-Albaani: “Anything, if one forgets.”

Q: “Even if it is a sunnah?”

Shaikh al-Albaani: “Even if it is a sunnah.”

* * *

Q: “Are the prostrations of forgetfulness before the tasleem or after the tasleem?”

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“For all prostrations of forgetfulness, one has the choice between prostratingbefore the tasleem or after the tasleem. And the detailed explanation mentioned in some, especially Hanbali, books that it is before the tasleem for additions and after the tasleem for omissions – this is baseless. Those who say so saw some cases to which such an explanation can be applied, however there are also cases that nullify this explanation. Therefore, one has the choice between performing the tasleem then prostrating, or prostrating then performing the tasleem of exiting the prayer.”

 * *

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“…When all the hadeeths are gathered together, it becomes clear that one who forgets in prayer has a choice: if he wants, he (first) performs the tasleem and that is absolutely better; or if he wants, he does not perform the tasleem except after completing the two prostrations of forgetfulness.”

* * *

Q: “During the prostrations of forgetfulness and the sitting between the two prostrations, is there any particular dhikr or is it the same as…?”

Shaikh al-Albaani: “The same as these (usual ones).”

Q: “The same as these i.e. tasbeeh and rabb-ighfir lee.”

Shaikh: “Yes, there isn’t anything special.”

* * *

Q: “Does one’s prayer become invalid if one intentionally leaves out the prostrations of forgetfulness?”

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“If he intentionally leaves them out, the prayer does not become invalid; however he will be a sinner because of his leaving out the two prostrations of forgetfulness that the Messenger ﷺ  ordered (us) to perform.”

[silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor 183/6, 133/12, 259/7, 406/10 & 81/3 / asaheeha translations]

Praying at Graves – Shaykh al-Albaani

source: fataawaa jeddah, tape no. 13/4
asaheeha translations

Question: “How do we reconcile between the Prophet’s (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) prohibition of praying in the graveyard and his praying over the grave of the woman who used to sweep the mosque?”

Shaikh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah):

“There is no contradiction between the two hadeeths, and all praise is due to Allaah. The first hadeeth with the prohibition of praying in the graveyard is as his  (‘alayhi ssalaam) saying in Saheeh Muslim: ‘Don’t sit on graves and don’t pray towards them.’[1] So the prohibition of praying in the graveyard, i.e. praying towards the graves, is because prayer must be sincerely for the Face of Allaah (tabaarak wa ta’aala) without any glorification for other than Allaah corrupting it or being mixed with it,  as that is one type of shirk.[2] So if a Muslim begins to pray to Allaah while facing the grave, there is an obvious suspicion that this person at least intends – as many of the ignorant people do in this era – to seek blessing from this dead person by means of his prayer and by means of his seeking nearness to Allaah (‘azza wa jal) with his prayer. Thus, he has fallen into some shirk,  and he may go too far into it such that his situation reaches the point where it would expel him from the circle of Islaam, and refuge is sought in Allaah. This meaning is what should be considered with regard to the Messenger’s (‘alayhi ssalaam) prohibition of praying in the graveyard or praying towards the grave.

As for praying over the dead person while he is in his grave, then this is something else. It has no connection with (the previous situation of) praying to Allaah – Who is alone with no partner – while facing the grave of the dead person, the intention of which is not so that Allaah forgives him, has mercy on him, as is the implied purpose when supplicating over the dead person.

Therefore, praying over the dead person while he is in his grave is one thing, and praying to Allaah (‘azza wa jal) while facing the grave is another thing. This (the latter) is what is prohibited and that (the former) is what is allowed, so there is no contradiction between this and that.”

[1] Saheeh Muslim #972
[2] associating partners with Allaah

Allaah is the Creator of both Good and Evil – Shaykh al-Albaani

The Prophet ﷺ said: “If you marry a woman or buy a slave, place your hand on her forehead, say ‘bismillaah’ and supplicate for blessing and say:

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ مِنْ خَيْرِهَا وَخَيْرِ مَا جَبَلْتَهَا عَلَيْهِ وَأَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ شَرِّهَا وَشَرِّ مَا جَبَلْتَهَا عَلَيْهِ

(O Allaah, indeed I ask You for the good in her and the good characteristics that You created in her, and I seek refuge in You from the evil in her and the evil characteristics that You created in her)

And if you buy a camel, place your hand on top of its hump and say the same.”[1]

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“This hadeeth has evidence that Allaah is the Creator of good and evil, contrary to those – such as the Mu`tazilah and others – who hold that evil is not from His creation تبارك وتعالى. There is nothing in Allaah’s being Creator of evil that contradicts His Perfection تعالى, rather it is from His Perfection تبارك وتعالى. Details of that are present in comprehensive volumes, one of the best being the bookShifaa ul-`aleel fi l-qadhaa.i wa l-qadari wa tta`leel by Ibn ul-Qayyim, so look through it if you wish.

And is this supplication legislated when buying something like a car? My answer is: yes, due to the good that is hoped from it and the evil that is feared from it.”


[1] Saheeh Abu Daawood 2160, Saheeh al-Jaami` 360 and others

[aadaab uz-zifaaf 20-21 / asaheeha translations]

~ asaheeha translation

Women Using Makeup – Shaykh al-Albaani

Source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light – tape no. 697

~

Question #3: “Is it allowed for the woman to put on make-up if she leaves her house wearing the hijaab?”

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers:

It is not permissible for the woman who does not wear hijaab, let alone who wears hijaab, to use the makeup of the disbeliever, the make-up of the rebellious and disobedient (to Allaah). When were you aware of some women’s adornment called by a name for which Allaah did not send down an authority: ‘make-up’? This is a word that we don’t know, not us nor your forefathers from before. Rather, it is a foreign word expressing an adornment for the rebellious and disobedient women of Europe; and our women – except those of them whom Allaah protects – unfortunately imitate decorating themselves with this adornment which the Islamic society is being affected by, namely make-up. So it is not permissible for the woman. And this reality is one of the strange ironies: in the road we see a woman wearing a decent hijaab (but) I don’t say the Islamically legislated hijaab; she ties what they call the ‘ishaarb’ – or khimaar which is the (correct) Arabic word – covering her hair, her neck and so on, but she has face powder and lipstick on. This (wearing the hijaab) is against this (wearing make-up): two contradictory, conflicting matters that do not go together. What is the reason (for this type of occurrence)? It is one of two things: either ignorance and heedlessness of the Islamically legislated ruling or it is due to the women’s following of the whisperings of shaytaan.

Therefore, we firstly remind the women who suffer from this make-up. Then secondly, we remind the guardians of women such as a father or a husband or a brother, due to the fact that (the Prophet) (‘alayhi ssalaat wa ssalaam) said: ‘Everyone of you is a shepherd and everyone of you is responsible for his flock. So the man is a shepherd and he is responsible for his flock-’[1] to the end of thehadeeth. Thus, the Arabic or general proverb states: ‘The horse is from the horseman.’ So you, the husband of the woman, it is not permissible for you to allow her to go out in this manner which puts to trial the middle-aged men, let alone the young men! And you, O man, O father, O brother, are supposed to be very jealous. Why? Because the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) used to say: ‘A duyyooth will not enter Paradise.’[2] Why? Who is a duyyooth? He is the one who does not guard his womenfolk jealously.”

[1] Saheeh al-Bukhaari # 893
[2] Saheeh at-Targheeb # 2071

~

asaheeha translations

Eating While Standing – Shaykh al-Albaani

We should not eat while standing

Q: “Is it allowed to eat while standing?”

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“I say, there is no text about the prohibition of eating while standing like there occurs the text prohibiting drinking while standing. But there is a narration from Anas bin Maalik رضي الله عنه that when he narrated to those around him in a gathering that the Prophet ﷺ prohibited drinking while standing, someone said to him: ‘What about eating (while standing)?’ He replied: ‘It is worse.’

I say here, we should follow this Companion because we don’t have anything with which we can contradict him. But what is the distinction between eating while standing and eating while walking? Eating while walking is allowed, because there is text clearly stating that they used to eat while walking during the time of the Prophet ﷺ. As for eating while standing, there is no text regarding it from the Prophet ﷺ, neither negative nor positive. All we have is this authentic narration from Anas bin Maalik and this is what we act upon.

Moreover, maybe some of you noticed in these times that it has become a fashion for the disbelievers to eat while standing although chairs are present; but they don’t sit on them out of pride. So then, the previous ruling is further strengthened. I say, we are with the narration of Anas, because Anas knew what we don’t know, and because the disbelievers nowadays and the Muslims who imitate them eat while standing, so we differ from them.”

[silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor 246/7 / asaheeha translations]

Remembering Allaah Morning and Evening – Shaykh al-Albaani

Source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light – tape no. 192

~

Question #6: “When is the time for the adhkaar[1] of the morning and evening?”

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers:

“The adhkaar of the evening are (made) after ‘asr, and the adhkaar of themorning are (made) after fajr.”

[1] words of remembrance of Allaah

~

asaheeha translations

Eating with Three Fingers – Shaykh al-Albaani

Source: silsilat ul-hudaa wa nnoor – the series of guidance and light – tape no. 692

~

Question #6: “Is it sunnah to eat with three fingers generally with respect to all food or specifically with thareed[1] only?”

Shaykh al-Albaani (rahimahullaah) answers:

“There isn’t, in the Sunnah mentioned from the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam), that which will help us to answer this question. All there is, is that the Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) used to eat with three fingers; but that which is necessary for us to say about this hadeeth with regard to its fiqh (understanding) is that:

Firstly, this hadeeth does not mean to determine that it is not permissible for the Muslim to eat by other means like the well-known spoons today. Rather, it only means that if the Muslim eats a food that can be eaten with three fingers, then he (should) not show that he is greedy with the food such that he eats with the whole handful while he is able to eat like the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) used to eat, with three fingers. Secondly, it is known that gravy of meat, for example, cannot be eaten with three fingers; so there it is necessary (to use) other means to eat it. And this is from the worldly affairs and not from the affairs of the religion, which the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) was assigned that he conveys all the rulings of the religion to the people. He (‘alayhi ssalaat wa ssalaam) has said (regarding) worldly affairs: ‘You are more knowledgeable about your worldly affairs than me.’”[2]


[1] a dish of bread, meat and broth
[2] Saheeh aj-Jaami’ #1488

~

asaheeha translations

A resident may combine prayers to avoid difficulties – Shaykh al Albaani

Q: “Is it allowed for a resident to combine Dhuhr and `Asr prayers without any excuse?”

Shaikh al-Albaani:

“Imaam Muslim reported in his Saheeh the hadeeth from Ibn `Abbaas who said: ‘The Messenger of Allaah ﷺ combined Dhuhr with `Asr and Maghrib with`Ishaa in Madeenah without being in a state of traveling or the presence of rain.’ They said: ‘Why did he do that O Abu l-`Abbaas?’[1] This was `Abdullaah bin `Abbaas’s kunyah. He replied: ‘So he would not put his ummah to difficulty.’’[2]

So what is apparent from the hadeeth is that it is permissible to combine two prayers while being a resident and without the excuse of rain, as rain is a Legislated excuse that allows the combining of two prayers. And here Ibn `Abbaas says that the Prophet ﷺ combined while he was a resident and combined without the excuse of rain, and he confirmed that when he was asked the previous question ‘Why did he do that?’ by saying: ‘So he would not put hisummah to difficulty.’ This is the hadeeth and it is in Saheeh Muslim, not al-Bukhaari. The same meaning is found in al-Bukhaari: that he combined prayers in Madeenah as eight rak`ahs,[3] but it does not have this detail that Imaam Muslim reported from Ibn `Abbaas which contains this important subtlety – i.e. his رضي الله عنه statement ‘So he would not put his ummah to difficulty’ in answer to that question.

So some scholars of both old and recent times hold that this combining is permissible for a resident without any excuse, and I don’t consider this correct because the narrator of the hadeeth justifies the Messenger’s ﷺ combining without an excuse with another excuse: which is to legislate and explain to the people, as Ibn `Abbaas said, ‘So he ﷺ would not put his ummah to difficulty.’This means that the ruling of combining as a resident is restricted to the presence of difficulty if one were to not combine. So when there is difficulty in performing the prayers in their known appointed times, it is permissible to combine to avoid the difficulty, which Allaah عز وجل negated in the likes of His Statement: {He has not placed upon you in the religion any difficulty}.[4] But if there is no difficulty, it is obligatory to maintain performing the five prayers, each prayer in its time, because there is no difficulty.

For example, I am sitting here and I hear the adhaan there in the nearby mosque and I am able to go out without any difficulty, then it is not permissible for me to combine. And vice versa: when I came on this trip I found that this electric elevator wasn’t working, and it is very difficult for me as you see because of a pain in my knees to go down or up by way of stairs. So some prayers went by and I didn’t go out to the mosque. But when the electric elevator was fixed and saved me the difficulty of going up and down, it became obligatory upon me to pray every prayer in the mosque because I did not find this difficulty that I had found when I just settled here. Therefore combining is only allowed to avoid difficulty; and when there is no difficulty, there is no combining. They are two inseparable matters: when there is no difficulty, there is no combining; when there isdifficulty, there is combining. And this is the best that can be said to reconcile between this authentic hadeeth and the hadeeths clearly stating that every prayer is to be prayed in its appointed time and that it is not allowed to distract oneself from it – especially since in most circumstances, combining necessitates leaving prayer with the congregation, as I described to you my previous situation.”


[1] the addition of “O Abu l-`Abbaas” is found in Musnad Ahmad 4/192
[2] Saheeh Muslim 705
[3] Saheeh al-Bukhaari 543
[4] Surat ul-Hajj 22:78

[fataawaa jeddah 13/5 / asaheeha translations]

Explaining Sūrah an-Nāzi’āt – Shaykh ibn Uthaymeen

Explaining Sūrah an-Nāzi’āt
تفسري جزء عمّ :Original Title
Original Author: Muḥammad Ibn Ṣāliḥ al-‘Uthaymīn
Translator : Abu az-Zubayr Harrison – authentic-translations.com

Contents of the article

Sūrah al-Nāzi’āt: Verses 1-14
The Explanation of Verses 1-14
Sūrah al-Nāzi’āt: Verses 15-26
The Explanation of Verses 15-26
Sūrah al-Nāzi’āt: Verses 27-33
The Explanation of Verses 27-33
Sūrah al-Nāzi’āt: Verses 34-41
The Explanation of Verses 34-41
Sūrah al-Nāzi’āt: Verses 42-46
The Explanation of Verses 42-46
Appendix: The Believer and Disbeliever at the Time of Death

Click the Below Link to read or download full article PDF

Explaining Surah an-Naziat – Shaykh Uthaymeen [PDF]